Just as with any reboot these days, a vocal corner of the internet have been calling this pen a failure since long before any of them even experienced it. Perhaps the problem is a modern one when enthusiasts such as myself own numerous fountain pens and have rather too many pens in use at any one time and are forever wanting to switch inks around. The new 51 from Parker is a shiny homage to the original, and I like it. Next time! I do not check PMs. Im claiming New Kid status here. I'm starting to have doubts with the today's Parker for QC or innovation in their modern fountain pens line-up. Instead, they took a nib/feed/cap design from the Jotter, pumped out a resin "hood" that was too wide to actually cover the nib, and fell back to the C/C mechanism while not even including a converter on the standard version. However, at 2x the price of the Sonnet, the 51 (2021) is one pen that has me feeling pretty disappointed. Now, for the other end: unscrew the blind cap. In My Day, to use a familiar locution, people used a Parker Vac 51 or an Aero 51 or pretty much any fountain pen without taking it apart for cleaning. Especially with the fact that the new editions are screw cap rather than snap cap (something the 51 was known for). The nib was definitely to save cost so they can just use the Jotter nib production line instead of opening a new production line; The plastic flaring was to fit the Jotter nib so it doesn't look too exposed (jotter nibs are not meant to be used on hooded nib designs in the parker 51, I mean they could make it look like the Duo Cart or Lamy 2000 but that would anger more people); Most high-end pens are screw cap, I guess that's what they are aiming for but they ultimately missed the mark by a mile; I still feel it was just a move to try to get money from people who felt nostalgic about the Parker 51. In hand, the new plastic feels as good to me as any other 51 I have ever written with. Of course there is a risk involved that you might cause some damage and so I hope my occasional blog posts on disassembling pens may be of help to anyone wishing to have a go. It has proved to be a very reliable writer and exceptionally good value, especially once you include the pleasure of cleaning it. Maybe even with a $50 pen I could see past these things, but for a $100 pen I think its a bit much. Never had a positive feel about this since the announcement. Spencerian for English, running script for Chinese) as being representative of call, I highly recommand taking a look at this guy's channel. - Works like a charm! The nib and feed are still inside the ink collector, with a clear plastic breather tube at the back. It does seem a weird design choice. ), Correct if i am wrong but i think they have some of the original machinery from parker so that probably helps. I do appreciate that certain vintage pen models were particularly popular, which is why I always keep an eye out for retro styled rereleases of pens. 5. Not sure this is worth the $80 I paid.

The polish on the resin equals that of lucite on the original 51. I compare this with the Monteverde Ritma, a less expensive pen mind you, which swapped out Monteverdes usual clamshell box for a cheaper looking plastic box, but also managed to include an inexpensive converter asking with the pen. Im really glad I held off purchasing one. It is probably fair to say that when you own one fountain pen and use it and refill it regularly, with the same ink, it will largely take care of itself. ballpoint /r/fountainpens - A community for fountain pen enthusiasts, from the novice to the collector. I am a great fan of the vintage ones, and my hopes were not very high, but I said, what the heck. But I dont think the 51 is any more over-priced than my (ahem, 7 and counting) HMISPHRES or, especially, the EXPERT. in time.

I took some pictures of this pen alongside a vintage Parker 45 and a more recent Parker Frontier. It could be that Ive never seen or held a BRAND NEW 51 before. But for me, I found it to be different from the other hooded nib pens I own, such as the Lamy 2000, enough so that it was worth noting. For most people this probably wont make a difference, but for some people I could see this rising to the level of a dealbreaker. When the parts have been rinsed and it is time to reassemble the pen, proceed as follows:-. Steven brown said the same thing in his YouTube review about the plastic flaring out so far at the front. An excellent and well balanced review. Thank you for this, Jerome. The Wing Sung 601 is a Chinese homage to the classic but long- discontinued Parker 51 vacumatic but with a few differences such as a stainless steel nib, ink windows and a price tag (in this instance) of around 7.50. and the screw-on cap. By Well done Parker! The cap, for example, has a nice brushed look to it, with a classic styled jewel shape at the finial, and an updated version of the Parker arrow clip. I stand by my tastes and also accept that they might change. When I saw that they finally appeared to be doing just that, I started to get excited at the prospect of a modern version of my favorite vintage pen. Mine has the soft rubber diaphragm but I have a later version too with a hard plunger instead. Im not usually a fan of screw-on caps in general because Im impatient and clumsy. Early thoughts on the Parker Vector XL fountainpen. I consider myself as a pretty lenient person, but this is simply unacceptable. I may keep an eye out of any limited edition colors come out with this steel nib in the future, but I cant imagine the $300 gold nib version feeling worth the asking price. I prefer to use a thicker silicone grease, which I purchased from a diving shop. The pens that started my collection included two original 51s, a demi-aerometric 51, and some lovely 41s. Hopefully, the lip will now line up over the hooded nib. Fountain Pen Inventory Database by Jon Rosen. Thepen is simpler in construction than I had imagined. The resin of the section and barrel I initially wrote off as plain and uninteresting, until I caught it in the right light.

Since buying this pen two years ago, it has stayed inked in my pen cup. It is like a very short full-circle journey back to the fountain pens that changed everything for me in May 2020, when a friend sent me a box of cool old drafting supplies, with a box of old fountain pens was at the bottom. Definitely not. But I understand the state if modern pen use enough that Im not surprised that Parker went with the cartridge/converter system. This new Parker 51 seemed to only capitalize on the legendary status of its predecessor. In some ways, this could be seen as an answer to Joes concerns last August at the Gentleman Stationer, that too many pens are being released too large these days, and there is a lack of options for people who dont want an oversized pen. So I just tried not to think about it so that I could avoid losing sleep over a writing instrument (theres precedent). 8. The outermost layer of packaging is a white cardboard sleeve with manufacturing information printed on it, as well as the nib choice and color of the pen inside. I really enjoy writing with this pen. What's the point? []. I personally found the pen to be a bit too short to write with unposted, but I think most people be fine to choose either option. Luckily I had a converter in my order Frontier that I was able to swap over, but it was my first sign that this pen was maybe a little less than it should be at the price that Parker is asking. Note: to reduce risk of damage, this stage could be skipped and the assembled nib, feed and ink collector instead be placed in water to soak. Its not that I dont appreciate them, but if a pen has managed to survive intact for 80 years, I dont want to be the one to break it. [] Reviewing the Parker 51 Fountain Pen. But when compared to, or as a companion for one of its elder brethrenit seems like it might be a big heaping bowl of disappointment. For what it is, and for what you get when you buy it, I feel it is simply priced too high. (And thats the nerdiest fountain pen thing I know how to say.). I completely agree. I dont feel strongly about the new 51 because I dont have to turn and turn the damned pen to get the cap off. And its just so very very lovely. It has been paired with Pilot Iroshizuku Tsuki-yo ink. Here are the steps to disassemble and reassemble this pen:-. While I really do love Watermans, I admit that they often seem over-priced. Yesterday, on finding it almost empty I decided to give it a clean. I bring this all up right now to dispel it a bit. [] Pencil Revolution, who liked the new Parker 51 [], Your email address will not be published. I appreciate the brushed finish on the cap and that there is a polished band at the bottom. Nib and feed directly inserted into the hood/shell. As with the Parthian shot or the sting in the scorpions tail, what some readers might take to be the rich payload comes at the end. I hear that the French Parkers are made at the Waterman factory, and the latter refers to the bodies of their newest pen, the EMBLME, as being made of precious resin. The refusal to include a converter with the standard/steel 51and the oddly high price smell like modern Waterman to me. I could see the same gap all the way down the ink collector and was relieved that it is meant to be like this and not some damage of my doing. I'd rather just get one of those vacuum pump wingsungs with a slip cap and a real hooded nib that actually looks like a 51 but is cheaper than a real vintage 51 such that it provides a viable choice of purchase. The section should be able to be dismantled for cleaning and swapping of nibs. Thats a theme for me with Parkers these days. Tighten with wrench but avoid over tightening. My first fountain pen was a Waterman Phileas I received as a gift in 2004. The short answer is, pretty well. An empty name that's barely able to still make one good pen line ("duofold") at a ridiculous price compared with the competition that far out classes it in every way. It skips, the nib and feed run pretty dry, the darned section gets scratched whilst screwing on or taking off the cap, it feels rather cheap and slippery to hold in the hand. It also affords an opportunity to see the separate components and better understand how pens work. I take your point about pens not needing much by way of cleaning. Okay, Im begging for it.

My pens were, IMO, none the worse for not being thoroughly cleaned as that is understood today. But many brands reuse nibs among pens priced at different points in their line-up, such as Lamy, or Kaweco. I do find hooded nibs to be better suited to slip caps, because it allows you to switch between capped and uncapped quicker, but the twist cap here is a perfectly serviceable option. Totally agree. I was never able to get my 51 to write quite right.

Wingsung, Hero and probably a few other China based offshoots are capable of making a more faithful 51 with their eyes closed, and they've even improved on the original by getting rid of the sac filler in some variants and all for less than a fifth of the price. Put the metal cap-retaining ring aside safely. As you can see, this new Parker 51 is similar in size to these legacy models.

The art deco vented pen cap pays homage to the early vacumatic version. Be careful not to distort the nib or damage the ink collector. If it is not quite right, just make a mental note of which way to make the adjustment; remove the shell, turn the ink collector a little to one side or the other as necessary and replace shell. In case you wish to write to me, pls use ONLY email by clicking here. On the Parker page that I linked above there is a nice little history of the Parker 51 model, but none of that is included with the pen. They might be tight and difficult to grip. Its a beautiful and quality fountain pen that is more than comparable to my 70 year old DEMI 51 and 1970s 61.

I have been waiting for athread showingthe innards. But lets start first by examining what you get when your pen arrives. Today using a fountain pen is, at least around here, a hobby, and I can understand that hobbyists Then I read a review on it. Hard to describe what personality is in a pen, but this nib just feels generic, about the same as a Jotter. The latest of these - with some amount of controversy regarding its design tweaks - is the 2021 model Parker 51. My Lamy 2000 and I: a new chapterbegins. on Reviewing the Parker 51 Fountain Pen. That was the writing experience I was looking for. With its large ink capacity and light use, it can easily stay inked for six months or more. Samuel Johnsons widely quoted No man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money strikes me as one of the falsest texts in the language, though very rich in ambiguities. Replace plunger. The new re-release of this pen brought "shame" to the name of Parker 51. I personally am not a fan of any squeeze-based filling mechanism, so Im perfectly happy with the twist piston converter. I have considered to put a epoxy resin inside the cap just to make it usable; I would not mind ink drying issues on open cap, but there is no excuse for ink drying when the cap is put on. I had a look just now, and it seems the BiliBili content producer's calligraphy is mainly in semi-cursive script ( running script). It is a great little pen. Change), You are commenting using your Facebook account. I like being able to remove a nib (such as on a Pelikan) to facilitate washing out the barrel and cleaning the nib and feed, to get things running like new, once in a while. There have been accusations of cheap materials and nibs, of the pen being a rebranded Jinhao, etc. And I am not a barbarian. I expect it to keep writing until Christmas. User-grade aerometric '51's with a gold nib can be found for less than the price of a steel nib 2021 '51'. , @hssqqWelcome for FPN, and thank you for your suggestion. This model does not make history but breaks it. There is the oddly high price, at over $100 retail. I said that the materials of the pen were unimpressive when I first picked them up, but thats not to say that they arent of a decent quality, fit, and finish. Unscrew the front shell, to expose the ink collector, nib and feed. I say this to make clear the second thing, that I set out to evaluate this pen on its own merits, not in comparison to the original Parker 51 or with the other pens from various Chinese brands which were inspired by the Parker 51. A cheap preppy even starts right up i heard the waterman expert has the same drying issue when the cap is closed. Granted the pen looks nice with the exception of the fugly gap between the hood and nib. Beautifully done; although I do find it a shame that these days, especially on content sharing platforms and in hobbyist discussion forums, it seems common to unduly focus on particular cursive scripts (e.g. And another one. This pen was purchased from Atlas Stationers at retail price. This isnt necessarily a negative, and for people used to other fountain pen models that hit the page like this it may nit be noticeable at all. No wonder my decade-old Duofold feels very different from modern Parker brands. (In fact, I think it IS the same nib.) Looking down while writing, the nib barely peeks out from the hood. Grip the tiny, tubular nib (and the black plastic feed inside) firmly and pull them out of the ink collector.